Monday, August 17, 2009

H1N1: Preparations for the Militarization of Public Health (updated 02.01.2010)

The H1N1 virus is not as deadly as the common cold. The panic and fear being generated by the government, the media and unscrupulous doctors at the CDC stands to enrich the powerful pharmaceuticals who will make gianormous profits from any mandated vaccination. Preparations for forced inoculations in the event of a pandemic and the militarization of public health are being made.

There are many more deaths from the common cold then there have been from this virus. According to the CDC, "The 15 leading causes of death in the US for 2006 include influenza and pneumonia.." And taking this vaccine could have unintended consequences. "Overuse of vaccines could result in human calamity."

Disease researchers have begun modeling how a future H1N1-09 swine-flu outbreak would spread throughout the world and have come up with some troubling scenarios. Infectious disease experts are beginning to describe modern efforts to quell seasonal and epidemic influenza with vaccines and anti-viral drugs using wording like "potentially dangerous," "worrisome," and "may do more harm than good."

The origins of H1N1
H1N1 did not originate in Mexico has reported in the mainstream media. A Wisconsin teenager was the first known person to get the "swine flu."

Funny isn't it what you can learn from watching the Colbert Report. Some news never get truthful coverage on the MSM. "Laurie Garrett who wrote a cover story for Newsweek magazine entitled "Swine Flu: How the H1N1 Virus Got Its Start," warns that the bird virus in Indonesia is 850 times as bad as the swine flu..."

According to This "pandemic" got its start from a *common* flu shot innoculation.

Both the WHO and the CDC announced in April, that the influenza virus responsible for the "pandemic" is a "novel triple reassortant virus" that combines H1N1 (swine) virus with H5N1 (avian) virus and Human flu virus, (H3N2). Press releases sent to the major media outlets of the United States, Canada, and the U.K. further declared that such a "triple virus" had never been seen before, that it was "Novel" (i.e. completely new.)

This information is patently and absolutely FALSE. According to the CDC's own magazine, "Emerging Infectious Diseases", outbreaks of a "novel reassortant triple virus" have been occurring since 2005. These outbreaks were just as significant as the California and Mexican cases, but for some reason, it was not reported in the mainstream media.

In the September, 2008 edition of the CDC's own EID Journal, the story of the 2005 diagnosis and patient history of the same Swine/Bird/Human virus now identified as the "2009 Novel Swine Flu" is well documented.

Three short weeks after receiving a standard flu shot, a 17 year old boy in Wisconsin comes down with influenza symptoms. Cultures taken from the boy, however, show that he is not suffering from a normal flu virus, but rather has a "novel triple virus" consisting of Avian, Swine and Human viruses.

According to CNN preparations for FORCED INOCULATIONS are being made.

A nationwide vaccination program is already planned for the Fall.

The pharmaceutical industry is slated to deliver 160 million vaccine doses by the Fall, enough doses to vaccinate more than half of America's population.

The Pentagon is already planning on the number of troops to be deployed,. with a view to supporting a mass vaccination program.

It is worth noting that this involvement of the military is not being decided by the President, but by the Secretary of Defense, which suggests that the Pentagon is, in a key issue of of national interest, overriding the President and Commander in Chief. The US Congress has not been consulted on the issue.

This decision to mobilise the Armed Forces in the vaccination campaign is taken in anticipation of a national emergency. Although no national emergency has been called, the presumption is that a national public health emergency will occur, using the WHO Level 6 Pandemic as a pretext and a justification.

Other countries, including Canada, the UK and France may follow suit, calling upon their Armed Forces to play a role in support of the H1N1 vaccination program.

Related posts:

Is There a Eugenics Experiment Aimed a Depopulating Haiti?

Is the WHO vaccination of millions in Haiti a Trojan Horse?

More backgound and sources:

H1N1 Pandemic: Pentagon Planning Deployment of Troops in Support of Nationwide Vaccination
- by Michel Chossudovsky - 2009-07-31
The Militarization of public health in the case of emergency is now official

The WHO plans to vaccinate more than half the World's population
by Global Research

Swine Flu: How the H1N1 Virus Got Its Start | Newsweek Health
The cause was a type of H1N1 that was a close match to the Wisconsin strain, ... farms were being subjected to influenza infections from farm poultry,

Ott - Evidence Of Actual Origins Of The H1N1 Pandemic
It is common practice that modern CAFO swine farms have strict sanitation ... In 2005, a Wisconsin boy is diagnosed with the same triple virus now declared

Overuse of Vaccines, Anti-Flu Drugs May Result in Human Calamity
by Bill Sardi


The following post (with updates) is at OpenSalon and contains additional info:
OCTOBER 26, 2009 5:03PM

H1N1: CDC, MSM, Obama are SO SCARED for US


Over at WIRED, they seem to have disabled the comments on the article "An Epidemic of Fear: How Panicked Parents Skipping Shots Endangers Us All." The writer Amy Wallace hinges her pro-vaccines argument on the "herd immunity" concept. From the title, one gathers that some members of the "herd" (parents) have decided in a "panic" to decline vaccination for themselves or other "herd" members (children), therefore they bear the responsibility for risking the health of the entire animal kingdom [sic].

The concept of "herd immunity" sounds to me like a pharmaceutical industry term that is very similar to "dead peasant" insurance (Does your Boss Want You Dead?)--both terms are equally offensive and hint at a hidden agenda.

According to the CDC, "herd immunity" is "A concept of protecting a community against certain diseases by having a high percentage of the community's population immunized... even if a few members of the community are unable to be immunized, the entire community will be indirectly protected because the disease has little opportunity for an outbreak. However, with a low percentage of population immunity, the disease would have great opportunity for an outbreak."

While parents may take exception to being the animals in this metaphor, it is an effective propoganda tool that relies on guilting people into not being the "freeloaders" who allow other members of the "herd" to bear the "risk" of vaccination. If the concept is to be believed--one should get vaccinated for the common good.

One could argue that this "herd immunity" concept is "Pseudo-science [which] preys on well-intentioned people who, motivated by love for their kids, become vulnerable to one of the world’s oldest professions. Enter the snake-oil salesman." This is Ms. Wallaces charge against those who believe that vaccines damage children's health.

Ms. Wallace cautions that "For starters, the human brain has a natural tendency to pattern-match — to ignore the old dictum “correlation does not imply causation” and stubbornly persist in associating proximate phenomena." So according to Wallace, to be reasoned and logical, one should demand peer-reviewed studies and scientific data to substantiate any concept that perports to have scientific value. Does the concept of "herd immunity" have a scientific basis? One is left to wonder.

Wallace singles out two Senators for criticism for buying the "snake-oil" of "pseudo-science": Chris Dodd of CT and John Kerry of MA are "currying favor" with their constituents by linking autism to vaccines, says Wallace. Wallace is also critical of Robert Kennedy, who she says "authored a deeply flawed 2005 Rolling Stone piece called “Deadly Immunity.” In it, he accused the government of protecting drug companies from litigation by concealing evidence that mercury in vaccines may have caused autism in thousands of kids."

Two activist moms, whose kids have medical conditions that both attribute to vaccines are Jenny McCarthy and Barbara Loe Fisher. Jenny McCarty, Wallace points out, is an actress and former Playboy centerfold who is apt to go off into "stream-of-consciousness rants" and is "the anti-vaccine movement’s most popular pitchman and prettiest face." Wallace grudgingly acknowledges Barbara Loe Fisher as "the movement’s brain" and "a skilled debate" against "well informed scientists," but then goes on to call her a liar. Paul Offit (he may seem "brash") says that Fisher "makes him particularly nuts, as in “You just want to scream.” The reason? “She lies,” he says flatly." Wallace explains that that Fisher maintains that draconian laws are forcing people to get vaccinated. "That isn’t true — the swine flu vaccine, like other flu vaccines, will be administered on a voluntary basis. But no matter: Fisher’s argument turns vaccines from a public health issue into one of personal choice, an unwritten bit of the Bill of Rights" writes Wallace.

Up until recently, vaccines may not have been mandated, but they were required by most school systems in order for children to attend school. Parents should be made aware that they can refuse to comply. For the record, in most cases a parent (and sometimes a student) can sign a form stating that they are against vaccination on conscience or on religious grounds.

There is a steady progression towards instituting mandates. In 2007, Texas became the first state to "require that young girls be vaccinated against some sexually transmitted viruses." This year state legislatures are debating whether to mandate the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for girls. Also this year, Massachusets' legislature has voted to fine, jail or forceably quarantine anyone who refuses vaccination in the event of a "public health emergency." There is a concern that this reaction by the Massachusetts legislature to the "pandemic" scare of H1N1 may be replicated by other state legislatures.

As an aside, schools are now equipped with a cornocopia of pharmaceuticals for the attending students for prescribed medical conditions. While many children with serious medical conditions do need their meds--it is worthwhile to note that more and more children, particularly black kids, are being diagnosed with "disruptive behavior" or ADHD and prescribed what are described as "behavioral drugs" or "psychiatric drugs." Do pharmaceutical companies benefit from this increase in diagnosed cases of "behavioral" problems? Do these drug companies have lucrative contracts with the public school systems? Are these things related? Makes you think.

As of last week the CDC is attributing 1000 deaths to H1N1, but can this figure be trusted given that the CDC lies? An article written in 2005, which has been substantiated by the British Medical Journal titled "Annual Flu Deaths: The Big Lie" takes issue with the CDCs numbers, flatly stating that the CDC's own findings in its National Vital Statistics Reports, are contradict the 63,000 flu deaths reported by the CDC. The real number of flu deaths is under 1000.

Reportedly, on Friday, President Barack Obama declared a “national emergency with respect to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.” Skeptics may well wonder at the hasty nature of the President's actions. Why do 1000 deaths from the H1N1 a cause for panic?

Is this H1N1 outbreak really a "pandemic?" By way of contrast, over 200,000 Americans die every year due to errors by doctors and hospitals. The CDC should be equally panicked about this issue of doctor and hospital errors which causes so many fatalities.

Just today CNN reported about an unfortunate woman who is now a quadraplegic due to a "miscommunication" at the hospital. She informed the hospital of her kidney stone, but they released her without taking care of it. The error lead to complications that caused the amputation of both of her arms and legs. Here is a link to the article: "Kids care for mom without arms, legs" By Ashley Fantz, CNN


Update 11.17.2009 -- two interesting articles that were brought to my attention...
FDA Approved H1N1 Vaccines Contain Ingredients Known to Cause Cancer and Death
"Most health experts will agree that vaccine reactions can occur. It is estimated that roughly 1 in every million people will react to their vaccine. Even then, health officials maintain that it is usually a simple case of inflammation at the injection site and/or a slight fever. On a rare occasion, anaphylactic shock may occur due to the patient reacting to a substance that they are allergic to. However, the FDA recently approved four H1N1 vaccines that not only contain very questionable ingredients, but some of those ingredients have even been proven to cause cancer and death."

Widespread rumors of Ukraine bioterrorism
This is not H1N1 2009 pandemic swine flu, also called California flu in Ukraine. People everywhere continue to refer to it as H1N1, but according to both WHO and the Ukraine government they are different diseases. The Ukraine government still reports only a handful of deaths from H1N1 California (”swine”) flu, with just one lab-confirmed death. Meanwhile both the government and WHO have been tracking the exponential increased of illnesses from severe acute respiratory illness, which have symptoms very different from H1N1 flu.

It is expected that within the next day or so WHO will release the gene sequence from tissue samples. Meanwhile speculation is rampant about what the ‘mystery disease’ actually is. Opinions range from a mutated, recombined, or man-made H1N1 to weaponized pneumonic plague or bird flu. At this stage there is no publicly available information on the cause. However, many observers say that it cannot possibly be H1N1 unless it is a different and much more virulent strain of it.

On October 29 people in Kiev and cities in western Ukraine reported that light planes and helicopters had been spraying something to protect people against swine flu. Business owners were told in advance to keep doors and windows shut and to stay inside. There were many reports to local newspapers and radio stations, but local officials would not let them be published.

Within hours people were feeling ill, some reporting red rashes on their arms. Within two days a dozen people had died of severe acute respiratory illness (reported by WHO October 30 on their website), some with their lungs full of blood, fevers up to 39C-40C, and lung temperatures as high as 55C. This severe hemorrhagic pneumonia has similar symptoms to the 1918 Spanish flu, pneumonic plague, pulmonary anthrax, SARS and avian flu (H5N1).

UPDATE 02.01.2010

Why Pig Flu Didn't Fly: the full story
By Niko Kyriakou (about the author)

On Tuesday, the Council of Europe launched an investigation into whether the World Health Organization "faked" the swine flu pandemic to boost profits for vaccine manufacturers. The inquiry, held in Strasbourg, France, vindicates a worldwide movement of insiders, experts, and elected officials who accuse the United Nations organization of misleading the world into buying millions of unnecessary vaccines.
"With SARS, with avian flu, always the predictions are wrong...Why don't we learn from history?" Keil said. "It [swine flu] produced a lot of turmoil in the pubic and was completely exaggerated in contrast with all the really important matters we have to deal with in public health."


No comments:

Related Posts with Thumbnails