Friday, July 30, 2010

Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and... other American Pastimes

It's not a book review, it's a life review.

They say sports and politics don't mix, but reading progressive writer Dave Zirin's book "What's My Name, Fool?" one sees that there is a rich legacy in America of athletes being at the forefront of demanding social change. These athletes transcended sports to become real champions. The book specifically covers athletes who have either spoken out on social justice issues or acted upon their principles symbolically or actionably, particularly in line with the sports they played. Many athletes courageously risked not only being ostracized and marginalized, but they also lost or stood to lose their livelihoods.

This book is also about good 'ol fashioned muckraking of the best kind. It casts a critical eye on the school athletic programs, owners fight against unions and the enormous profits and perks that the public subsidizes for corporate magnates who build the stadiums and groom the superstars that people follow, watch and obsess over. These are the controversies the mainstream media and the folks at ESPN won't cover.

While Zirin focuses on some celebrated non-comformist athletes like Muhammad Ali, Jackie Robinson, Billy Jean King, Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Carlos Delgado, Reggie White, but also covers lesser known courageous athletes like Tommy Smith, John Carlos, or former Notre Dame basketball player Danielle D-Smooth Green, who lost her left hand in Iraq and has spoken out against the "war" in Iraq. He also covers the unsavory side of sports like steroid use, collegiate sports abuses, homophobia, and the misogynist and discriminatory practices that plague women in sports years after Title IX became law.

Zirin gives some attention to often vilified sports figures like Kobe Bryant, Barry Bonds, Rasheed Wallace, and grill man George Foreman. These are not the usual people associated with social justice and resistance, but Zirin includes them in the lineup to make a point. In Kobe Bryant's case, if convicted of raping a Colorado woman, he faced a shockingly invasive procedure, which is a part of a supposed "rehabilitation" system. Zirin describes the process in an article entitled "Kobe Bryant and the Price of Freedom" posted at Counterpunch.

There are also a couple of passages on teams as opposed to individuals. Teams featured are the Iraq soccer team: "Iraq as a team does not want Mr. Bush to use us for the presidential campaign, he can find another way to advertise himself." There's a passage about the University of "Alabama's Crimson Past:" Yeah, the words "Segregation forever!" were used and perfectly incapsulates Alabama's torrid history of racism. The story of Sylvester Groom who was passed over as coach of the Tide, although he was far more qualified than the less qualified Mike Shula, who had half of Groom's experience. As Zirin puts it, "Groom was set to resume his role as an invisible man, returning to the shadows where all African-American assistant coaches are told to sit and wait." An incensed Reverend Jesse Jackson said of the decision, "The SEC maintains a culture of excluding Blacks beyond the playing field." Jackson continued, "White players, beyond the field, can expect to become coaches, athletic directors, and college presidents. Blacks have no life beyond the playing field." Jackson was predictably skewered by the media for pointing out these facts. Zirin concludes that the "tradition" that Alabama was trying to preserve consists of a pattern of racially motivated persecutions and "the ordinary people bleeding rivers in the streets as a result of asking for the most basic of human rights." Zirin also points out that it's time for the Redskins football team to retire that tired and offensive name, which alludes to a historically racist perception of Native Americans.

Zirin invites controversy in a passage called "USA Basketball in Black and White!" To make his point he describes America as lording it over other countries in sports and politics as the world's only superpower. This he says, has led to people in other countries seeking "dents in the armor." What is a new phenomenon, writes Zirin, is that people inside the U.S. are cheering against one U.S. team in particular. The "U.S. basketball squad became the team fans in the U.S. love to hate," says Zirin. "And for all the wrong reasons," Implying there are good reasons. You gotta like this guy! He describes the animosity of these "fans" as "more racist than a Bob Jones University course syllabus." Zirin goes on to describe how talk radio has fanned the flames because of its tolerance of people making statements like "a caller who identified himself as a former member of the American military." The man "said he hates Team USA because they don't "represent the America he fell in love with." This is the same kind of rhetoric that is rampant in the tea party. So it's not surprising to see racism reflected by people who purport to be all-American patriots. The rule of thumb being to always preface your demagoguery with patriotic lingo or your service to your country.

Muhammad Ali never sought to be a political hero or resistance fighter, he was thrust into that realm because he took a stand. Ali is considered a hero, not only for his prowess in the ring, but also because he refused to serve in Vietnam. For that, he was stripped of his boxing title and threatened with jail.

Ali famously stated, "Man, I ain't got no quarrel with them Vietcong." Is there a more colorful character in the American sports pantheon? Only boxer Jack Johnson (he's in the book) could possibly rival Ali for brashness and flash. Says peace activist, Daniel Berrigan, "It was a major boost for an anti-war movement that was very white." Ali, "couldn't be dismissed as cowardly." Ali was pilloried in the press and lost his livelihood and prestige for a time. Redemption came when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down his sentence.

It makes one wonder whether a crucified Ali might have been a more effective leader in the struggle for civil rights in America. He probably would have been a dead Black hero. But what would motivate the "Supreme Court" of white men to acquit this big baddass Black man? The answer lies in the fact that Ali symbolized the type of hero that so many men admire. Many men of all stripes must have identified with Ali's braggadocio, swagger and the physical violence evidenced in his domineering presence in the ring. For a country whose unofficial motto is "might makes right," this must be a consideration.

Muhammad Ali got the seal of official approval for his dissent, so did it make it easier for him to abandon his mentor and friend Malcolm X? Ali got unprecedented support from the public for his stance on Vietnam. Those who continue to view him as anti-establishment these days are no longer mainstream. The change in Ali and in America was not overnight, but these days Ali is an establishment hero. Also, sadly, Ali's infirmity due to Parkinson's has drastically blunted his radicalism. In recent times, politicians and promoters have counted on Ali to show up and promote diverse spectacles, from the Olympics to fund raisers.

That politics is a taboo topic for many of today's athletes is a stark reality. Undoubtedly, athletes avoid the topic in order to keep or get endorsement deals. It's ironic then, that what's unacceptably bad behavior for most of society, such as cross-dressing, drug abuse, sex scandals, fathering multiple children out of wedlock and even criminality are too often just temporary bumps on the road for famous athletes.

It must be noted that there are always exceptions to the rule, and so the athletes who endorsed Barack Obama's run for office were bucking the trend, but nonetheless, few athletes came out and declared themselves to be supporters of Candidate Obama. It was interesting, to hear that Kareem Abdul Jabbar – who was featured in Zirin's book under the heading "Why can't Kareem coach?"– rebutted statements made by Magic Johnson, a Hillary supporter. Johnson suggested that Obama was an overreaching rookie. Kareem's comeback was "Obama's no rookie."

Black athletes today are able to avoid political land mines, but this was not so easily done back in the fifties and sixties during the civil rights and the politically charged "Cold War" era. Jackie Robinson and "[m]any African-American witnesses [were] subpoenaed to testify at the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) hearings in the 1950s [and] were asked to denounce Paul Robeson (1888–1976) in order to obtain future employment.

An interesting passage in "What's My Name" describes Jackie Robinson's true personality as "angry, combative and confrontational." Since this is a stark contrast to the public image of Robinson "as a quiet, subservient, soft-spoken gentleman," it may be difficult for some to take too seriously the author Dave Zirin's attempt to rebut an often one-dimensional narrative on Robinson's legacy. The perspective of many blacks during the "Black power" period was that Robinson was as a "white man's negro." Evidently, Robinson was a Republican, who voted for Nixon. Zirin is right that no one remains static, but the perception is there because there is plenty of basis for it in reality.

The task becomes more difficult for Zirin in light of Jackie Robinson's betrayal of Paul Robeson at the McCarthy hearings. The book explains that although the NAACP offered to defend Robinson, if he chose not to speak, Robinson refused the offer and went in front of the committee with a prepared statement.

After the preliminaries, Robinson proceeded to volunteer a condemnation of Robeson. Robinson: "I haven't any comment to make, except that the statement [about blacks refusing to fight the USSR]--if Mr. Robeson actually made it--sounds very silly to me. Negroes have too much invested in America to trow it away for a siren song sung in bass."

The book describes Robinson's betrayal of Robeson as "the blow that took down a seemingly indomitable Robeson."


The "blow" lead to even more sustained attacks on Robeson, who was an All-American football player, valedictorian and recipient of a Phi Beta Kappa key at Rutgers University. Robeson went on to receive a law degree at Columbia and became an internationally acclaimed concert performer and actor as well as an influential worldwide political activist.

Paul Robeson was a man of enormous athletic and artistic talents, there is no doubt, but his courage, poise and principles where what he displayed in his statement to the HUAC. Robeson: “You are the un-Americans, and you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.” Robeson's historical legacy as an activist and renaissance man is intact. In 1961, Robeson was found with slashed wrists following a "wild party" in a Moscow hotel room. His son Paul Robeson, Jr. has tried to get the release of withheld government documents that he believes could shed light on the circumstances surrounding what he believes was an "induced suicide attempt."

In stark contrast to Robeson, Mr. Robinson was able to find gainful employement after his retirement from baseball. He won many awards and recognition. He was as a spokesperson for Chock Full O' Nuts and was named their "Director of Personnel." While there are many exceptions to the rule, in America, traditionally the personnel department is chock full of African-Americans. Coincidentally, executives in the personnel department are very often not in the boardroom with the decision makers of a corporation.

Robinson brought a home in a white upper class neighborhood of Stamford, CT. Robinson's family was probably that town's first Blacks. In the neighboring town of Greenwich, CT, usually ranked as one of the richest in America (top three), evidently such a thing was not possible at the time, the sign at the Cracker Barrel restaurant on the Post Road up until 1968 read, "Whites Only." '68 was not a good year for Blacks in America. On April 4, 1968, MLK was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee while in town to support a garbage man strike.

Jackie Robinson as a resistance fighter may have emerged from being the first black in baseball to suffer the outrageous abuses of being spat at, baited, ridiculed and threatened, but the radicalizing of Robinson was probably solidified when he experience the "blow" of being ignored by his "friend" Richard Milhous Nixon when Robinson sent "Tricky Dick" a letter requesting his intervention on behalf of MLK, who had been sentenced to four months on a Georgia work gang.

In 1955 many historically explosive civil rights events occurred, including the Montgomery Bus Boycotts, Emmett Till's murder and the swelling of the ranks of the White Citizens Council to 300,000 members. Also significant was the signing of a petition by one hundred Congressmen pledged to uphold segregation. It was also an incredibly taxing year for Jackie Robinson according to Zirin. Robinson was "never silent" on the issue of civil rights and for that and his race, he was "viciously booed and threatened" on and off the baseball diamond.

It must have been a great release to be able to express himself freely after his retirement from baseball in 1956. Robinson jumped right in, becoming a spokesperson for the NAACP. He also voiced criticism of discrimination in baseball after he retired and was writing a column for The New York Post (then a liberal paper).

The highest praise for Robinson as a "resistance" fighter comes from MLK who supported his right to speak out on politics: "He has the right because back in the days when integration wasn't fashionable, he underwent the trauma and the humiliation and the loneliness which comes with being a pilgrim that walks in the lonesome byways toward the high road of Freedom. He was a sit-inner before sit-ins, a freedom rider before freedom rides."

Reading the book gives one hope, because these men and women embodied the best instincts we have as human beings. These athletes tackled the difficult issues that make others uncomfortable; matters of war and peace, race and social justice and economics and class warfare.

Of course, most heroes are the extraordinary people who make a difference by the actions they take to help their fellow human beings. A hero is not necessarily honed by their physical prowess on the field of play, but is made strong by the adversities they face in life and the positive changes they make in people's lives. In that sense there are many unsung heroes waiting to be discovered.

Shirley Sherrod is just such a hero. Sorry Alvin Greene, the NAACP will probably not be honoring you this year, but they most likely will be taking a second look at Ms. Shirley Sherrod.

Update 6/26/2014: Edits to clarify the legibility of the passage on Jackie Robinson and his legacy .

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Duvalierist Make Some Noise

A Guide to Connecting all the Caribbean Dots

A hollow demonstration was held by a group of men in Port-au-Prince's Delma community. They were demonstrating for the return of Jean-Claude "Baby Doc" Duvalier. In effect, the "manifestation" was for the return of dictatorship to Haiti. Many who commented on the spectacle observed, "How much money does it cost to buy such a demonstration?" Others were saddened by what they saw as, "A sign that democracy in Haiti is in trouble after the ouster of Aristide."

What about democracy for Haiti? Haiti's 2010 presidential election is scheduled for November 28. And Reuters reported that President Réne Preval rejected the ranking Republican on the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Richard Lugar's election proposals.

Lugar reportedly wants "to ensure the participation of factions within an opposition party loyal to exiled former President Jean-Bertrand Aristide." Question: is the Senator entirely sincere in his efforts to make sure that Haiti has a free and fair election? One can't help but noticed the equivocal term "factions" from the above statement. What does that mean exactly? It does make it clear that some "factions" are acceptable to Uncle Sam, while others are just out of luck.

In an article on MetropoleHaiti.com (French), Dr. Maryse Narcisse (who is the former president's Fanmi Lavalas party's appointed representative) is quoted as saying that there are traitors [maybe "factions"?] within Lavalas who worked to exclude Lavalas from the next election. Quoting an observer:

"If it is true, it is high treason against the people. Why doesn't she just name the people involved? The people need to know who betrayed them. She went on to say that Lavalas no longer wants to participate in the next election, but rather the resignation of the CEP and Preval only. Why would she not want the party to participate in the next election?

By doing so, she is doing exactly what she blames the traitors of doing. So the people will not have the choice to vote for Lavalas candidates. Her position makes her look like she is the head traitor, the plant, the infiltrator, the agent working to keep Lavalas from elections twice in a row.

I was in Haiti during the last election. People were on radio Guinen begging for Lavalas to get its act together so they can vote their conscience. Instead she was quite busy suing her comrade in a court infested with agents and at the end there were no Lavalas candidates. Her job is to fight and keep on fighting to keep the Party on the ballot every time there is an election, make sure the votes are counted and counting."

What is going on? Well, you see, as long as a conflict can be manufactured, then Fanmi Lavalas "factions" can be excluded from elections. It's apparently the role that the good Dr. Narcisse is playing in this "electoral coup."

It must be said that many have questioned the company that the former president has chosen to keep. This was a problem when he was president of Haiti. One issue was the U.S. based Steele Foundation, which played (or didn't play) a critical role on the night of Feb. 29, 2004, when he was forced out of the presidency. Aristide was hustled onto a plane bound for the Central African Republic in the dead of night by the U.S. At the time Aristide accused the Steele Foundation of withdrawing protection under orders from the U.S. His assertion was confirmed and you can find a detailed account of that fateful night here.

Many have also noted the make-up of Aristide's Foundation, whose board is liberal elite white -- as are by the way, his Miami lawyer and most of the people who are Aristide's closest confidants. Not that he doesn't have the right to choose exactly who he wants to represent his interests, but well, maybe it's just his interests.

Back to the Haiti election farce: It's hardly a secret that President Aristide was Washington's and the Republican party's least favorite "socialist" and liberation theology advocate. So it comes as a surprise that Richard Lugar is in support of Lavala's participation in the elections. After all, Aristide's Fanmi Lavalas party is hardly seen by Washington as a separate entity from the man they removed from office.

Given that the U.S. is leading the reconstruction effort in Haiti and that former president, Bill Clinton (a man who imposed rigorous and damaging structural adjustment programs and privatization demands on the Aristide government as a condition of his return to the Haitian presidency) is leading the Haiti Interim Reconstruction Commission (Co-Chair Jean Max Bellerive is a figurehead and Preval's "veto" power is an appeasement) and the fact that the U.S. along with the "international community" have the power to pull funding and a bevy of other supports from the Haitian government and people at will, clearly, it would be foolish to believe that Preval can choose to ignore directives from Washington.

By the way, how far removed from Haitian life on the ground is Bill Clinton? One has only to check out Bill and Hilary Clinton's new $11 million compound in Bedford Hills, New York to see that they move in a different stratosphere from the Haitian population. Maybe, this is what the Democrats actually mean when they say their party "is a big tent." This 7,000 square foot one is just for two. Clearly, their "big tent" is a far cry from a leaky tent in Haiti.

So with Haiti's most popular party out of the picture, the stage is set for a return of the "electoral coup ."

At this point, the most pressing question being asked is, who will be the U.S. pick for Haiti's presidency this time? Or, to put it another way, "who will the U.S. choose to humiliate Haiti with this time?

To hazard a guess at this stage is demonstrably early given the habit of Haiti's Provisional Electoral Council (CEP) of postponing the election at the last minute, usually by a couple of weeks or more. This device usually serves to weed out the candidates who announce early. The field is then clear for the late candidate whose coffers are full and available for that last victorious push.

ColonelTheodore

Dr. Guy Theodore may just defy the odds. He fits the bill quite nicely as a U.S. candidate. He is a former U.S. military colonel, and is well positioned to impose a dictatorship in Haiti. A colonel expects a "yes sir" or "no sir" from his subordinates. Any insubordination is met with harsh punishment: court martial and jail.

Dr. Theodore bears an uncanny physical likeness to Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier. Also, like the former brutal dictator, Dr. Theodore is a country doctor.

It must be said that Dr. Guy is known for his charity work and humanitarianism. His narrative is spotless. This is what makes him the ideal candidate to highjack or seduce a popular movement. In an interview with Little Rock, Arkansas natives and Directors, Brent Renaud and Craig Renaud for the New York Times, Dr. Theodore said he favored the postponement of presidential elections. He thinks that democracy can wait.

Little Rock, Arkansas is a haven for filmmakers who end up covering Haiti stories for the New York Times is it?

According to the website ConsortiumNews.com, back when Francois Duvalier was elected in 1957 to the Haitian presidency, the NY times originally depicted Duvalier as a "mild mannered doctor." The connection is: the NY times seems to be treating Dr Theodore with the same kid gloves. Here is the actual quote:

"Despite the New York Times’ initial portrait of him as “mild-mannered doctor,” Duvalier, upon winning the presidency in 1957, became a ruthless, corrupt dictator.

Dr. Guy, like Haiti's former "president for life," is also not too keen on elections.

"No election now, there is not the time to talk about an election." Dr. Theodore asserts forcefully, "to me, is the time to talk about taking care of the people and building the country. Going and campaigning now I don't think is the time."

DrTheodore+PapaDoc

He will serve the United States with great ease as a former Colonel. If he wants to, he can become a modern day Dr. Francois Duvalier.

Hopefully, the younger generation who were around during the Fanmi Lavalas grassroots movement have learned something about democracy and will not tolerate the idea of life under a dictatorship. The majority of the people who lived and suffered under the Duvalier dictatorship are either dead, in exile or disappeared all together - but many have told their stories to the next generation. It won't be so easy to fool the younger generation into thinking that a dictatorship is what is needed.



Duvalierist_ArielleJean-BaptisteOn January 16, following the earthquake, CNN's Fredericka Whitfield interviewed Arielle Jean-Baptiste . Jean-Baptiste is of Haitian descent and worked for the USAID cartel in Haiti. Some who lived through the Duvalier era may remember hearing her name in Haiti. Her family was deeply in bed with the Duvalier dictatorship. Her family was part of the Duvalier motorcade. One wonders, how could CNN parade someone so closely associated with a brutal dictatorship like her on TV without so much as a disclaimer?

Jean-Baptiste has also been tapped for interviews by NPR on matters regarding Haiti.

She was part of the Haiti Democracy Project back in 2004. HDP is funded by the right-wing Haitian Boulos family headed by the infamous Reginald Boulos. Boulos has close business ties with USAID.

Question: What NGOs or opposition organizations in Haiti didn't USAID fund? Not many. The NGOs are defacto ruling authorities in Haiti and do not have to account to the Haitian government for any of their actions.

As for Arielle Jean-Baptiste, formerly of USAID, to many Haitians who read or listen to her, she is just like the rest of her Duvalierist family -- entitled, arrogant and unconcerned about the vast majority of the Haitian people. The Duvalierist did whatever they wanted in Haiti knowing that they had the full backing of a superpower.

In her final comment to NPR, Jean-Baptiste says that government's role is limited in Haiti: "The governance is - once people start getting money, putting their kids to school, having a better life, you can have a new generation that will be - they will ask for accountability. Okay? Money in people's pocket is what's important."

The thought is muddled by the accountability issue, but one thing comes through: she does seem to be saying that government and its role is of no importance.

But can you have accountability without having a real democracy? That of course is a pipe dream or carrot stick that she's apparently learned from her time at USAID, that can never be attained. The U.S. which claims to be the land of the free and the home of the brave, is a viper's nest of war criminals, torturers, banksters and corporate raiders and marauders. Accountability -- pshshshssss!

Speaking of corporate marauders: An undeclared war on Haiti has raged undetected by the "lamestream" media and we didn't understand why such a poor country would be a target. Recently, a war was declared on Jamaica's poverty striken Tivoli gardens and as we watched the bodies pile up we asked ourselves: why are these poor people being attacked by their own government?

To see the connection, you have to understand that these two countries are seen as the weakest links. Once they fall the rest could fall like dominoes.

The Caribbean is the new target of the big guns in DC and the West because they are sitting on the kind of abundant natural resources and riches that could change the geopolitical status quo for all time. It could turn the world upside down (economically), if the governments of Cuba, Haiti, Jamaica, Grenada, Belize, Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, Guyana, Suriname, Mexico, Colombia and Venezuela can hold on to the wealth for their people's benefit and prevent their torturers from the global north from extorting it from them.

The Hydrothermal Energy and the Destabilization of The Caribbean Basin




Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Georgia White Dirt Cookies:
Care for a Merlot with that dirt?

Guest post by DirtCheapShot

I went to a supermarket in Georgia to buy a bottle of water and walking past the fruits and vegetable section I saw something that caught my attention.

Next to the bananas and peaches were several bags of mud pies, not the dessert, DIRT COOKIES. I picked up a couple of bags.

I vividly recall that many years ago, I saw people snacking on bits of that same stuff in Haiti and enjoyed quite a few bites. So who is eating that stuff in the United States?

I asked a few people who were born and reared in Georgia and other southern states if they knew about that good ole Georgia Dirt. They've all told me that they've eaten their fair share and even sent shipments to their relatives living up north who cannot find it in local stores.

It appears that African-Americans, Euro-Americans and Indigenous Americans all partake in this good ole Southern tradition. So, with the power of narratives and a powerful media, that same dirt eating tradition in Haiti made the news only to be portrayed in a different light.

It is obvious that the women of the informal sector in Haiti could not package and sell their dirt cookies in stores and supermarkets for $1.99 plus tax. What is readily available in stores, gas stations shelves, supermarkets all over the Southern states was unknown to American reporters covering Haiti.

I am sure that mud pie story was well used for fundraisers around the world. While harvests around Haiti are not making it to Port-au-Prince and going to waste for lack of roads and transportation, mud pies was the headline given to the world.

The rice barons in Arkansas and Texas were probably reading that story after 18 holes of golf. I praise the entrepreneurial spirit of the women who are trying to make ends meet out of dirt.

I hope that one day their goods can be among the list of exports. Obviously there is a market for that stuff and the Haitian dirt tastes much better.

Un pays qui perd son artisanat perd son âme.
A country that loses its craft loses his soul.

Background: A microbe found in Haitian dirt can be developed into a powerful antibiotic.